And due to our great lust for energy and electricity and comfortable lifestyles, we will not stop until we all die! It is all amazingly simple and obvious!
The models get core assumptions wrong — the hot spot is missing 22 — 26, 28 — 31 Clouds cool the planet as it warms 38 — 56 The models are wrong on a local, regional, or continental scale. Figure 1 Climate Sensitivity Comparison empirical methods versus models, for a doubling of the CO2 level.
The direct effect of CO2 is only 1. Models amplify that warming with assumptions about positive feedback see the blue region of model estimates in the graph below. But observations show that net feedback is probably negative, which would instead reduce the direct effect of the extra carbon dioxide.
While independent scientists point to the empirical evidence, government funded scientists argue that a majority of scientists, a consensus, support the theory that a man-made catastrophe is coming.
The test of scientific knowledge is through experiment and observation.
The only evidence the government scientists provide on the key points of attribution the cause of the warming come from simulations of the climate done with computers. A multitude of observations are in rough agreement that any increase in global average temperature caused by a doubling of CO2 is more likely to be about half a degree than the 3.
The major problem for models: Feedbacks Our climate changes because of outside effects, called forcings: The Earth is a ball of magma, is a 12, km thick, with a thin crust about 12 km of rock on top, who knows what effects come from within?
The IPCC recognizes only two types of forcings: Forcings are difficult to unravel. Harder still are feedbacks, as systems all over the planet simultaneously adjust to changing conditions. In a warmer world, for instance, less ice and more plant-life means less sunlight is reflected to space, which creates more warming.
The oceans release carbon dioxide, more water evaporates, humidity changes, sea-levels rise, and all of those consequent changes further affect temperatures. Indeed while CO2 may cause one degree of warming, the feedbacks amplify this — theoretically anyway — by up to three degrees.
The major agent of feedback, according to the IPCC, is water vapor ie. Some details matter more than others. Models assume that relative humidity will stay the same over the tropics as the world warms, that clouds are a positive feedback and not a negative one, and that cloud changes are a feedback and not a forcing in their own right.
These are three critical and demonstrable errors. In addition, if Miscolscki is right, and an increase in carbon dioxide leads to a decrease in water vapor, then the sensitivity due to CO2 could be close to zero.
The global warming predictions are contradicted by the data. The exception proves that the rule is wrong.
That is the principle of science. If there is an exception to any rule, and if it can be proved by observation, that rule is wrong. Lerner, Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms.
American Geophysical Union, pp. Prall,Jacob Haroldand Stephen H.There’s brand new published, peer-reviewed literature out showing that CO2’s impact on global warming is far less than what was once previously suggested.
Time to end the climate hype.
Of course some alarmism-addicted readers will insist that we ignore these findings, and blindly accept the. Environmental Awareness - Naturalist Intelligence Environment is the area in which we live.
The thin layer of air that surrounds our planet that supports benjaminpohle.com are the only kind of life that we know of that exists in our universe.
If we did not have our environment we could not exist. It takes only one experiment to disprove a theory. The climate models are predicting a global disaster, but the empirical evidence disagrees. The theory of catastrophic man-made global warming has been tested from many independent angles.
The heat is missing from oceans; it’s missing from the. One part of a recent survey caught my attention. The strongest correlate of opinion on climate change is partisan affiliation. Two-thirds of Republicans (67%) say either that the Earth is getting warmer mostly because of natural changes in the atmosphere (43%) or that there is no solid evidence the Earth is getting warmer (24%).
Modern Global Warming (MGW) is the change in climate that has been taking place from the coldest period of the Little Ice Age (LIA) to the present. It is characterized by a preponderance of warming periods over cooling periods, resulting in the warming of the planet, expansion of tropical areas.
Hi AndyG55 and Steve. Don’t misunderstand, basic physics is fact and is needed to understand the greenhouse effect, so you can’t ignore it. But “not ignore” or “consider it” .
EVERY (6 pound) gallon of gasoline or diesel burned adds pounds of CO 2 to the Earth's atmosphere note 1, essentially benjaminpohle.com have been doing such things for years. People are confused by the fact that only very minimal average temperature rises have been detected, and so they claim that no Global Warming is occurring. Modern Global Warming (MGW) is the change in climate that has been taking place from the coldest period of the Little Ice Age (LIA) to the present. It is characterized by a preponderance of warming periods over cooling periods, resulting in the warming of the planet, expansion of tropical areas. Feb 24, · Climate researchers have published a new paper this week in the journal Nature Climate Change that acknowledges there has been a global warming slowdown from Their research shows a hiatus did indeed occur and continued into the 21st century, contradicting another study last June that said the hiatus was just an artifact that "vanishes.