One day I decided to take my wife and children for a visit to the Tolerance Museum in Los Angeles California, the end result that it was proven to us, beyond any doubt, that we are ALL prejudiced. Today I am of the opinion that people in general are not truth seekers, since most people constantly try to fit the facts to match their wishes. Theology has been used by many; the KKK have found in the Bible reasons to hate black and Jew, the Pogroms found in the Bible reasons to commit atrocities towards the Jew, and even schemers are seen daily on TV using the Bible like the old medicine man, offering healing, signs, and wonders.
Millennium 3 - description It is interesting to read the definition of "Millennium" from Webster's dictionary Christ will return before the years 2 Post-millennial: Christ will return after the years.
This view holds that the gospel will triumph over evil and not the visible second coming of Jesus Christ. No literal, visible millennium on earth.
This view holds that Satan is bound and the church is experiencing the millennium now. In fairness, it should be noted that this summary is meant to be a generalization and does not seek to go into the various arguments or permutations of belief of the post- and a-millennial views.
One is referred to other websites and resources for that exercise. It should also be stated at the outset of this website does not espouse a single specific theological approach to eschatology including, including even Dispensationalism which also strongly supports a literal millennium.
Instead the approach is to seek to adhere as best as is humanly possible to a literal interpretation of the Biblical text. As a chemistry major at the University of Texas and later as a medical doctor trained in the practice of observation of literal tissue samples specifically as a pathologist analyzing various tissues and cells of the human body under a microscope I take the approach that if the plain sense of the Biblical text makes good sense in context, then one should seek to make no other sense out of the inspired text for fear that the conclusion may end up as sheer nonsense.
And so it follows, especially if you are new to the study of prophecy, that one of the most important rules for accurate interpretation is to allow the Scripture to speak for itself, reading the text for the normal, plain sense, as long as the context allows see discussion on Reading the Scripture Literally.
Utilizing this admittedly simple and even somewhat simple minded approach, it is difficult to overlook John's declaration that there is a year period in which Jesus Christ will reign and rule on earth as Lord of lords and King of kings. In fairness, it should be acknowledged that there are many good and godly people who disagree with the literal interpretation of Revelation 20 which leaves the non-literal interpretation as their only option.
By default, they must resort to allegorical, spiritual or symbolic interpretation. A non-literal interpretative approach opens one to the vulnerability of fallen man's ingenuity and imagination.
In other words, how far does one control the limits of their spiritualizing? What is the plumb line that determines the accuracy of their non-literal assessment? The inherent dangers of non-literal interpretation should be readily apparent.
I firmly believe that the difficulty of defining when an interpretation is too allegorical, too spiritualized, too symbolic, too mystical, etc is one of the major reasons there are so many conflicting and confusing interpretations on the book of the Revelation and specifically on this short section of Scripture in Revelation And is it possible, that the Old Serpent, Satan, the liar, the devil, the diabolos literally one who throws between or comes between and so one who divides!
When I ask "Why not? If you are born from above, your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, Who lives in you as your resident Teacher, Whom Jesus said "will teach you all things" John Before you go any further and are biased even more by the interpretative comments on this page, you might take a moment and lay aside all you preconceived notions, your denominational trappings, your favorite prophecy teacher's interpretation, etc, and come to Revelation as if you have never read this section before.
Ask your Teacher the Holy Spirit to lead you into all the truth. Come with a heart that is tender and that trembles at His Word Isaiah Remember that "God is not a God of confusion"! You might also want to try to group the major events together and number each group.
Then armed with what the Scripture clearly states, you will be better prepared to evaluate what the commentaries including the one you are reading have to say about these passages. As I always like to say "It's amazing how much light the Scriptures will shed on the commentaries! Again, try to put aside anything and everything you have ever been told about prophecy in general and the Revelation in particular, so that you might arrive at the most objective interpretation possible.
May God's Spirit grant you His amazing grace to do so.
The Millennium If you observe Revelation As you look over this outline ask yourself "Does this sequence of events seem logical and orderly? Is years not compatible with God's plan for the end of time? Is it because you were taught by someone you respected who simply did not believe the years was literal?
Or is it because you have read several commentaries that don't interpret "" as "one thousand"? Even if you did not know that there were literally dozens of Old Testament Scriptures that perfectly paralleled this period of "one thousand years", can you not see how the literal interpretation fits so well into the flow of events in these last chapters?
Notice I am not espousing any particular theological viewpoint dispensational or otherwise but only a simple minded literal reading of the Scripture.
And I saw heaven opened; and behold, a white horse, and He who sat upon it is called Faithful and True; and in righteousness He judges and wages war.
And His eyes are a flame of fire, and upon His head are many diadems; and He has a name written upon Him which no one knows except Himself. And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses.
And from His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may smite the nations; and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty.The Logos edition allows you to bring your studies much further than before.
Integrating seamlessly with your software, these volumes appear in your guides and search results, contributing to your research whether you’re studying a topic or a passage. Early Christian Fathers – Richardson The Apostolic Fathers – Lake Mathetes – The Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus Polycarp – The Epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians.
The American Journal of Biblical Theology is a weeky peer-reviewed journal in its seventeenth year that provides an outlet for publishing Christian theological works. . The remnant is a recurring theme throughout the Hebrew and Christian benjaminpohle.com Anchor Bible Dictionary describes it as "What is left of a community after it undergoes a catastrophe".
The concept has stronger representation in the Hebrew Bible and Christian Old . An Interpretation of Zephaniah - Interpreting scripture is necessary to Christian life, whether a Christian is seeking leadership in ministry or simply trying to gain understanding of scripture.
Biblical Commentaries Online. Links updated August The commentaries linked to on this page differ widely in their quality and usefulness for different purposes.